| Mere Mortals Die, But Subsidies Live Forever |
|
|
|
| Written by The Bensonhurst Bomber |
| Sunday, 30 September 2007 18:14 |
|
Interesting piece in today’s NY Times about the glut in the ethanol market. Of course, ethanol has been a rallying cry for Mac-Grove environmentalists, the DFL, and our own RINO governor, Tim Pawlenty, for several years. It’s hard to find a Midwest politician – Democrat or (pseudo) Republican alike –who hasn’t uttered the words “Saudi Arabia of the Midwest” at one point or another. Ethanol, we were told, was going to end our “foreign dependence” on oil and make us all rich. In reality, if we planted corn on every arable acre in the U.S., the resulting ethanol would only replace 10% of the oil we use. The bigger lesson here, of course, is that you can’t cheat the market. It always finds a way to exert Adam Smith’s invisible (and inevitable) hand. Just read the first few graphs of the Times story tell a different story:
Unfortunately, even though prices are down 30% on average ($2.42 a gallon on the East Coast and $1.77 in Iowa), there is no discussion whatsoever of a corresponding reduction in the government subsidies for ethanol. If you were hoping for that, lay down on the couch for 15 minutes. Your fever will pass. The laugh-out-loud quote of the piece was this:
If Mr. Brehm really thinks “the market” is pricing ethanol, he must have taken MacroEcon 101 at the U with C. Ford Runge. |







