| The Short Attention Span Assistance Act |
|
|
|
| Written by Mitch Berg |
| Thursday, 07 February 2008 10:08 |
|
The point of the caucus system is to give party activists a voice in how the party’s business and nominations are carried out. Of course, it lowers the definition of “party activist” so far that virtually anyone can stand up and be counted. In the GOP, it means you spend maybe ninety minutes (sixty in my precinct) taking care of the most trivial party business possible - electing precinct officers, voting on resolutions - and, finally, the endorsement straw polls. In the DFL, of course, it means that you can show up, cast your ballot, and go out and get a latte before The Practice is on. But the key point is that they - and the various types of primaries that other states use to determine their party nominees - are the parties’ mechanisms of publicly selecting nominees, courting public involvement, and carrying out their public business. The other night, as people on both sides of the aisle noted, caucuses were flooded. On the DFL side, they were flooded with vote ‘n dash voters. On the GOP side, caucus sites had plenty of people show up who wanted to do the same; some left in a huff when they were told they actually had to stay and conduct Republican Party business; others - many, many others - stayed and participated, in the biggest turnout in recent memory. It’s for the vote ‘n dash voter - the people with the short attention spans who want to make a simple, black ‘n white ideological statement and get out - that the Strib comes out today:
“Some”? Well, they do get a little more specific later on. Let’s continue:
To which I call “Buncombe”. Party business is party business. Who should pick a party’s nominee - people who aren’t involved in the party at all? Remember - the general election is open to all; the primaries are (I’ll repeat myself) party functions.
Oh, there were logistics problems; finding, or even remembering, ones’ ward an precinct after two years can be daunting, and at my district gathering two very busy people frantically scanned sheets of tables to find them for the long line of caucusers.
(So fix the problem; give out photocopied maps of your district and let 80% of the people do it themselves!)
But - as usual - who’ll come to the aid of the ill-prepared, the uncommitted, the ignorant and the short attention span?
Rest assured, party faithful on both sides; the DFL will be there, waiting to dilute your votes and sap your commitment with the masses of fair-weather participants for whom these measures are designed to make life easier! The results are predictable:
No big shock there. The more the system facilitates ignorance and a skin-deep familiarity with politics, the better the DFL does.
Let’s put a cork in this deeply-stupid idea. |





