| Evil is still in Style |
|
|
|
| Written by JRoosh |
| Tuesday, 12 August 2008 17:29 |
|
I was reading a summary of a journal belonging to Hideki Tojo, one of Japan’s World War II era Prime Ministers, that described his disposition just after the incineration of Japan’s Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The mindset of the times and of this man seem to express a level of nationalism and kamikaze pride too extreme to exist today. To think that a nation would preemptively attack another to gain ground or extinguish another people is nearly unthinkable in this day and age. Fifty years seems like a long time, especially for me, one generation removed. Names like Hitler, Mussolini, Hirohito and Tojo are just ink on a page in a history book. The evil they represent has been diluted by time, relative peace and prosperity in America. …and then Russia attacks Georgia and we are faced with the fact that history repeats itself. And that a stong national defense, and the proper use and maintenance thereof is of no less value now than in any time in the past. Probably even moreso now as more and more nations, with our help, gain footholds in world commerce, capitalism and democracy, thereby becoming world powers if not superpowers. One has to wonder if we weren’t in Iraq and gearing up for an attack or counter-attack on Iran, would our response to Russia’s attack on a burgeoning democracy and ally to the West be more than tough talk on the part of Bush and McCain. Is our military as stretched as we keep hearing? …or do we have capacity to wage war that is kept up our sleeve? It seems to me that the attack on Georgia should not have been a surprise, and even if it was, why are we (and I mean the whole Western world) not responding in kind while hundreds maybe thousands of citizens of a sovereign nation lose their lives and homes to a neighboring aggressor? European leaders have criticized us for Iraq and yet I still get the feeling that those same leaders are looking to us for a reaction to the (now apparently reduced if not ceased) aggression on the part of the Russians. Will there ever be a time when America is not expected to shoulder the burden as well as the criticism of being the globe’s police force? In any case, I think it wise for voters to consider their choice for President as it relates to their role as commander and chief of America’s military resources. Talk is cheap and it is clear that we have given Russia exactly what they anticipated in planning this attack. At the same time, Iran is watching us right now and no doubt the world’s response can only be emboldening their irrational ambitions. Speaking of cheap talk (guess who):
Not that George Bush’s response has been all that more assertive:
I would have liked to also have heard:
As costly as military action is, sometimes it is a necessary tool to act as a deterrent to those that would use it against weaker nations. It may be all that they are capable of understanding. Sometimes the Good Guys need to kick some ass. I often see “War is not the Answer” lawn signs and bumper stickers and in response I always say “It depends on what the question is.” Russia (and Iran) may need to be answered soon. I hope we are ready. Cross-posted and comments welcome at Shot In The Dark. |




