| Michele Bachmann Outraises Tinklenberg, Olson |
|
|
|
| Written by Gary Gross |
| Wednesday, 16 April 2008 11:43 |
|
According to Larry's post, Michele Bachmann is sitting in solid financial shape heading into the campaign season. Here's why I think that:
It isn't a stretch to say that interest in Tinklenberg and Olson is minimal at best. both candidates have flaws that the activists are having difficulty looking past. While I won't paint this race as over, I'm perfectly willing to paint this as an uphill challenge for either Mr. Tinklenberg. I think it's safe to say that Mr. Olson doesn't stand a fighting chance even if the perfect storm developed. Despite these fundraising numbers, the Strib's Bob von Sternberg implies that this is a hotly contested seat:
To be fair to Mr. Sternberg, he later said this:
If this fundraising trend continues, the DCCC support for Mr. Tinklenberg might quickly evaporate. I've talked with several DFL activists about Tinklenberg. Each of these activists initially prefered Olson over Tinklenberg but soured on Olson after he took the attack dog approach at a recent debate. These activists didn't think highly of Mr. Tinklenberg, partially because of his career as a lobbyist, partially because of his "less than stellar" progressive history. Despite the fundraising disparity, John Wodele had to say something. Here's his quote in the Strib:
It does nothing of the sort, Mr. Wodele. What it says is that the NRCC isn't willing to give Mr. Tinklenberg a fighting shot. Mr. Wodele can say whatever he wants but he must know that the fundraising numbers don't tell the tale that Tinklenberg will be competitive. Comments welcome at LFR. |







